FIRST TO HVE A 6 SECOND PASS N PROSTREET

[SWIZ]

if you are heavier than 110 lbs before you put your leathers on, you are too heavy to be on a nitrous bike!!

Who is lighter then 110 in street clothes???

[Ronnie Mitchell]

a butterfly.

[Jason Miller]

I believe the best conditions for a 6 second Pro Street pass will be at MIR during the Superbike Finals on October 2-3. This was the race that Bud Yoder went 7.11 twice at and Mike shut off at the 1000' and went 7.20 at. The October air at MIR is generally in the 60s and track conditions are perfect! We also may be running Pro Comp that weekend as well, which will help with track conditions even further. I think the 7.11 record will come down at that race. Not sure if a 6-second run will happen at that event or not, but I can see 7.0s possibly.

[xclr82xtc]

are you talking about a prostreet legal bike has already run under a .10 which means an 0?

Seb he dont here ya.

yeah I know hahahaha

sorry i have sh!t to do besides monitor threads for smart a$$ comments. And from what i was told a a bike has been 7.0s in testing. i dont know if it met ALL the rules as it was a test session, but it is a "pst" bike.

[Richie]

sorry i have sh!t to do besides monitor threads for smart a$$ comments. And from what i was told a a bike has been 7.0s in testing. i dont know if it met ALL the rules as it was a test session, but it is a "pst" bike.

So what PST bike went 7'0s in testing?

[popa doc]

sorry i have sh!t to do besides monitor threads for smart a$$ comments. And from what i was told a a bike has been 7.0s in testing. i dont know if it met ALL the rules as it was a test session, but it is a "pst" bike.

YOUR PERIOD MUST BE ON.

[NLRsystems]

My bike runs 7.15 with a 1.29 60 ft solid. My bike runs 2.37 backhalfs solid as well.

What will it run when I go a 1.21 60ft? Any guesses?

[BROTHER-N-LAW]

My bike runs 7.15 with a 1.29 60 ft solid. My bike runs 2.37 backhalfs solid as well.

What will it run when I go a 1.21 60ft? Any guesses?

Not any faster if the numbers don't work all the way down the track. I haven't seen anyone go that fast this year. It's kinda like Victor going 209 mph at only 7.40s.

[NLRsystems]

your kidding right? If the bike picks up 8 hundreths in the 60 ft it will pick up the same at a minimum at the 1/4 mile on a good pass. Obviously we are talking about a good pass...

I dont spit out a teen on accident or get lucky. Ran 7.15 twice last year. Once in indy in the heat and on my first qualifier in valdosta last year at the finals before I got sick and had to leave.I have raced one time this year and that was at montgomery.

now back to the question

[sportbikeryder]

My bike runs 7.15 with a 1.29 60 ft solid. My bike runs 2.37 backhalfs solid as well.

What will it run when I go a 1.21 60ft? Any guesses?

see if Ronnie Mitchell will loan you a 1.19 tune up

[dragasixtyinchbusa]

My guess would be a solid LOW 0'. In my opinion, again just my opinion, there is a misinterpretation of how a stellar 60ft relates in these new style cluthces. If Seb was to go a 1.21 60', I'm quite sure the 330 and on incrementals would drop SIGNIFICANTLY as well relative to the drop at the 60'. What I was meaning by the difference in the new clutch set ups are how on older clutch set ups (standard multi stage) where there wasn't quite a handle on lowering the 330's as they are in todays standards with the new clutches. It was easier to lower you 60' and have the 330' suffer as a result of being able to throw the bike out the gate better but lose momentum as a result of a wheelie etc. With these new clutches you don't see nearly see the wheelies or tire spinning tendencies compared to what you use to with the multi stage clutches. The transition from initial static to the first stage of clutch relative to rpm now seems to really have helped the dropping of the 330'. Not only that, but the ability to control the power not only through the clutch but the boost management systems as well seems to be superior (knowledge being one) than what it was years ago. Again, this is all my opinion, but if Seb was to go 1.21 you would see a significant drop in overall et being everything else is clean from that point on. If you run a 1.21 60' and don't lose momentum like we so often saw with the multi stage, the et HAS to lower at least what the 60' difference was.

My bike runs 7.15 with a 1.29 60 ft solid. My bike runs 2.37 backhalfs solid as well.

What will it run when I go a 1.21 60ft? Any guesses?

[BROTHER-N-LAW]

your kidding right? If the bike picks up 8 hundreths in the 60 ft it will pick up the same at a minimum at the 1/4 mile on a good pass. Obviously we are talking about a good pass...

I dont spit out a teen on accident or get lucky. Ran 7.15 twice last year. Once in indy in the heat and on my first qualifier in valdosta last year at the finals before I got sick and had to leave.I have raced one time this year and that was at montgomery.

now back to the question

I would agree, but that would be on a good pass and I haven't seen anyone go that fast this YEAR. On those turbos what I've seen is when you change 1 thing it changes something something else and it doesn't go any faster. JMO.

[xclr82xtc]

isnt the general rule of thumb that 1 on the front is 3 in the back.. so if you knocked .08 off the 60, then that .24 off the et 7.15 - .24 = 6.91

but then again. that same math might not apply when you get this fast...lets sat 1 up front is 2 at the back so 7.15-.16=6.99

isnt there a thread around here somewhere that talks about rodney flirting with the teens in the 60?? ..or it might of been that he is real close to what the outlaw bike did in the 60, or something like that. either way, i think my money is on rodney, seb, or mikey.

[SWIZ]

So what PST bike went 7'0s in testing?

X2

Ok, so did a PST go 7.0's or not? If so, who and where?

[Richie]

X2

Ok, so did a PST go 7.0's or not? If so, who and where?