mirock dude you got a heck of a job . i guess whenever you guys come to a conclusion on these we will just have to adapt to what you guys come up with.
mirock dude you got a heck of a job . i guess whenever you guys come to a conclusion on these we will just have to adapt to what you guys come up with.
leaveyouwalking
Cant see this working out to well for the tech guy
I got a 99 Busa that's been out in my garage for 8years now crying to get out. My stroker motor is still under my work bench. I got some work to do if someone pulls the trigger on this thing. I'm 240 now. I can get to maybe 210 -220 suited if the rules work to help a bigger guy out.
You guys need to gear the rider weight closer to 180-190 suited for any big guy to have a fighting chance. But I think tracks would rather see fast bikes than full fields....
If you got a problem call me 804-874-6079 james
-phil, why ban blocks if there is such a wide range of bore and it has to be policed?? i had no billet blocks in my set of rules to police bore in a simple way. but at this point, its pointless to prohibit an aftermarket block. besides, what about the heavier people who will fall in the higher weight brackets?? he may want/need a bigger bore than an 85mm. but there is no performance gain in having an 84mm stock block vs an 84mm aftermarket block. people keep talking about cost, but if you dont want or need an aftermarket block, DONT BUY ONE!!! doesnt matter what everybody else has
-as far as billet cranks, they need to be allowed. PERIOD
-i can live with no ti rods as a rule
-no auto's is a good one too
-i vote for 2" ground clearance. i challenge ANYONE to tell me when they have ever seen anyone bust a flat oil pan in with atleast 2" of ground clearance in ANY CLASS!! street bikes with stock pans are the ones who break pans. the do not get checked for ground clearance, and WE DO!! but we get penalized for what the street bikes do. besides, many people have a 2" billet oil pan, or a murray pipe. if 3" is the rule, some of those bikes will be high and will be forced to buy the 1" pans raised up pipes, etc. i think the more "outlaw" or "mean" stance and look these bikes have, the better for appeal
-as far as standalones...... i say NO!!! phil you keep talking about the fact that they arent much more than stock ecu's and all the electronics you have to put on them. i agree that an ENTRY LEVEL standalone is not much more expensive. but a Motec M800 & harness IS!! and if standalone is allowed, so is the M800 or whatever other ECU that has high cost. so if standalone is allowed and can be done so cheap. put a PRICE CAP on what can be used. but people will find ways around that im sure. but power commanders, bazazz, flashed ecu's, and sb6's work just fine in my opinion. and average joes can work them. standalones will make people dependant on people. remember pro street back when mirelli's first came out? i personally like the standalones and the idea and capabilities of them, but im thinking of the whole class and general public
-as far as the capabilities of a gen 2 busas ecu...... do these advantages show ON THE TRACK??? i ride them, zx14's, 1000's, etc and i have not seen these advantages on my time slips. i do not agree that its an unfair advantage. and besides, thats the beauty of picking your bike!! i will be riding a gen 1 busa and HAVE NO FEAR OF A GEN2 and its ECU editor flashing capabilities
-no carbs or aftermarket throttle bodies. why?? be CONSISTENT!! if we are keeping cost down the best we can, lets keep the cost down the best we can! if $2500 ti rods are expensive and therefore prohibited, so should a set of $2500 lectrons, or $3500 injectrons, or whatever else. and carbs call for an aftermarket ignition(mc4, pro series, firestorm, etc) with the cheapest one being an additional $800. if carbs are allowed, I WILL HAVE THEM!! but like i said, lets be consistent. OEM is simple and cheap. it already comes on the bike!!
-wheels?? come on guys. its a pro category. we should be allowed to buy whatever wheels we choose. bst's, marvics, etc have been around a long time. lets keep them around. some of you guys with the smaller cc engines who are allowed to be a lightweight package will need bst's or marvics(or any magnesium wheels). i will have forged aluminum wheels on the bike im riding because i need to make 600 lbs.
but as i read these posts, i see a lot of people worrying about what the NEXT MAN will have or be doing. when the rules are finalized, if billet blocks are allowed, WHO CARES?? there is no illegal bore size, so whats the point?? think of the big picture and the whole class, not just YOURSELF because you dont want or cant afford a block. it doesnt mean the next man will win! but you will hurt the big guys. aside from the ti rods, all other engine components should be allowed. a gen 2 busa comes with ti-valves, so allow them to everybody, which is the same reason standalones are being considered. remember consistency?? but i see a lot of personal agendas. which is cool, but dont be biased. i want ti rods, but i can see the reason for not having them. thats UNBIASED!
ultimately i want to see a class come from all this. we can go back and forth forever. but its going to take some compromise and sacrifice. we all have different ways to skin the same cat. but we have the opportunity to have an ALL MOTOR class. lets make it fair, as affordable as possible, as simple as possible(if simplicity works best), and have some FUN!!!